| Course Unit Code | Course Unit Title | Type of Course Unit | Year of Study | Semester | Number of ECTS Credits | | KMY2042016225 | PUBLİC POLİCY | Compulsory | 2 | 4 | 5 |
|
| Level of Course Unit |
| First Cycle |
| Objectives of the Course |
| • To present the policy cycle and to assess how policy issues become identified and formulated as such and to develop the ability to analyze and where appropriate reformulate particular statements of policy problems and objectives.
• To enable students to understand and utilize key terms and concepts of public policy and to develop an understanding of the multiple facets of public policy and of the problems and possibilities inherent in the process.
• To provide students with an understanding of the multiple roles, expectations, and strategies of the various stakeholders in the public policy process and their impact on policy development, implementation, and evaluation.
• To familiarize students with a range of skills and tools for more effective implementation in complex and often turbulent environments
|
| Name of Lecturer(s) |
| Prof. Dr. Argun AKDOĞAN |
| Learning Outcomes |
| 1 | Find out a policy problem related to TODAIE with your team members. You will then analyze the policy problem and will find out some possible solutions. The reading assignment of this week offers you a guideline to conduct this analysis. | | 2 | Find out a policy problem related to TODAIE with your team members. You will then analyze the policy problem and will find out some possible solutions. The reading assignment of this week offers you a guideline to conduct this analysis. | | 3 | Find out a policy problem related to TODAIE with your team members. You will then analyze the policy problem and will find out some possible solutions. The reading assignment of this week offers you a guideline to conduct this analysis. | | 4 | Find out a policy problem related to TODAIE with your team members. You will then analyze the policy problem and will find out some possible solutions. The reading assignment of this week offers you a guideline to conduct this analysis. | | 5 | Find out a policy problem related to TODAIE with your team members. You will then analyze the policy problem and will find out some possible solutions. The reading assignment of this week offers you a guideline to conduct this analysis. |
|
| Mode of Delivery |
| Evening Education |
| Prerequisites and co-requisities |
| None |
| Recommended Optional Programme Components |
| None |
| Course Contents |
| This course examines how public policy is created, implemented, evaluated and held accountable in the current social, economic and political environment. The course is designed to both promote an understanding of the theories and approaches to policy analysis and help the student to acquire a working knowledge of the skills involved in the practice of policy analysis in the area of public administration.
|
| Weekly Detailed Course Contents |
|
| 1 | course goals and objectives, | | | | 2 | Public policy analysis exercise | | | | 3 | Introduction to public policy and policy cycle | | | | 4 | Decision-making theories
| | | | 5 | Decision-making theories
| | | | 6 | Implementation theory and practice
| | | | 7 | ) Stakeholder analysis | | | | 8 | Project Implementation
| | | | 9 | Logical Framework Analysis
| | | | 10 | Public Policy Evaluation | | | | 11 | Public Policy Evaluation | | | | 12 | Public Policy Evaluation | | | | 13 | Group report presentations
| | | | 14 | Group report presentations
| | | | 15 | Group report presentations
| | | | 16 | Group report presentations
| | |
|
| Recommended or Required Reading |
| Bardach, E. (2000) A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem Solving, Chatham House Publishers, NY, pp. xiii-46
Parsons, W. (1995) Public Policy, Elgar: Cheitenham, pp.13-30 and 32-39.
Etzioni, A. (1967) “Mixed Scanning: A Third Approach to Decision-making”, Public Administration Review, 27, pp. 385-392
Smith, G. and May, D. (1993) “The Artificial Debate between Rationalist and Incrementalist Models of Decision-Making” in the Policy Process: A Reader, M. Hill (ed.) Wheatsheaf, pp. 197-211.
Sharkansky, i and Zalmanovitch, Y. (2000) “Improvisation in Public Administration and Policy Making in Israel”, Public Administration Review, 60(4), pp. 321-329.
|
| Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
|
| Assessment Methods and Criteria | |
| SUM | 0 | |
| SUM | 0 | | Yarıyıl (Yıl) İçi Etkinlikleri | 40 | | Yarıyıl (Yıl) Sonu Etkinlikleri | 60 | | SUM | 100 |
| | Language of Instruction | | Turkish | | Work Placement(s) | | None |
|
| Workload Calculation |
|
| Midterm Examination | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Final Examination | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Quiz | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Discussion | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Question-Answer | 14 | 2 | 28 |
| Individual Study for Homework Problems | 14 | 2 | 28 |
| Individual Study for Mid term Examination | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Individual Study for Final Examination | 1 | 3 | 3 |
|
| Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes |
| LO1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | | LO2 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | | LO3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | | LO4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | | LO5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
|
| * Contribution Level : 1 Very low 2 Low 3 Medium 4 High 5 Very High |
|
|
|
|
Ordu University Rectorate Building ,Cumhuriyet Campus , Center / ORDU / TURKEY • Tel: +90 452 226 52 00
|